Mongrel Lofts
78 posts
Nov 10, 2005
7:45 PM
|
Yes, it was a question asked by an ultra purist. He asked another one of the same persuation if he thought it was a good idea for a judge not to score a colored roller.
The other guy's answer was, he thought he was being discriminated against by not being asked to be a judge because of his hatred of colored Rollers. He may be right. The way some of them hate these birds, I would be leery of having them judge mine.
Hey Men,
I want to ask any of you. Have you guys ever seen this asked and answered like this on Tony's list or anywhere else? This is the kind of warped twisting of things, that just baffles me. This is just another example of men taking half of what is said, Then adding what they wanted it to say. Then twisting it to fit their agenda. Amazing..
Maybe this will help you understand why the WC committee can't have half truth being twisted and spread around by the men who don't even have a clue what is really going on. Mongrel Lofts
|
Velo99
152 posts
Nov 11, 2005
4:50 PM
|
Kenny B,
I am going out on a limb here. I believe that a judge should be considered impartial. If there is any doubt that could cast aspersions on the integrity of the judge,a representative of the sponsoring organization,I would say no way. Example in point;Lawyers try to find a judge in the district that is "sympathetic" to their case(s).
MTC YITS
V99
|